Theology for Vladimir Lossky and Gilkey - MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about theTheologyfor Vladimir Lossky and Langdon Gilkey. Answer: Introduction Within the area of evolution in the Christian theology, the major conflicts centers around the Christian doctrine of sin. The traditional formula of this doctrine has evolved through various claims and addressed different dimensions. The famous theologian Vladimir Lossky has evolved his ideas of the Christian traditions and had argued that the traditional theologians in the orthodox era had preserved the mystical dimensions of theology in an integrated method[1]. Whereas Langdon Gilkey has more focused on the modern interpretation of the traditional reformation and emphasized the social and individual self delusion and the estrangement. This essay focuses on the comparison and contrast of the both the ideas of the theologians, especially on the basis of their famous writings. Discussion Vladimir Lossky has especially used the term mystical theology in describing the traditional theological traditions of the orthodox churches. However, this term was not clearly defined in his book The Nature of Eastern Orthodox Theology. This book was not really about the mysticism of the Christianity; rather it does not include any kind of vision or the mystical experiences. This book mostly speaks about the conventional account of the Christian doctrine, the Incarnation, the Trinity, the life of Church and the mission of the Holy Spirits. The book was a quite confusing as the author himself do not sick to his idea of God what he explained in the beginning of the book[2]. His ideas regarding Trinity of love, Devine mysteries portray a different orientation to the ideas of mysticism that are actually associated with the Western idea of mysticism. It was rooted in the life of church, yet it is not individualistic and indifferent to the hierarchy and the sacraments. On the other hand, Langdon Gillkey talks about the doctrine of the original sin and the choices for existence that an individual faces each day. He was more concerned about the reformation ideas of the Christianity. He deals more with the Protestant view of the Christianity and unlike Vladimir Lossky he emphasized more on the notions of communion and jeopardized the liberty of individual behavior[3]. According to Gilkey, the idea of Catholicism deals with "a remarkable sense of humanity and grace in the communal life of Catholics. ... Consequently the love of life, the appreciation of the body in the senses, of joy and celebration, the tolerance of the sinner, these natural, worldly, and 'human' virtues are far more clearly and universally embodied in Catholics and Catholic life than in Protestants and Protestantism."[4]. Gillkey suggested the Catholic sacra-mentality or the principles might provide a more sacred entrance to the new Christian tradition which will be relative with the contemporary existence of men. Conclusion In conclusion it can be said that, where Vladimir Lossky more emphasized the conventional ideas of the Christian doctrine, Langdon Gillkey had put more emphasis on the present scenario and the contemporary idea of the Christianity. Gillkey has pointed out the views about the liberal concepts of the religion and Losskey on the other hand emphasized the traditional views about it. Reference List Baker, Matthew. "Neopatristic Synthesis and Ecumenism: Toward the Reintegration of Christian Tradition."Eastern Orthodox Encounters of Identity and Otherness. Palgrave Macmillan US, 2014. 235-260. Cavedon, Matthew P. "Independent Science, Integrated Theology: How Process Theology Can Inform Christian Orthodox Theodicy." (2013). McGrath, Alister E.Christian theology: An introduction. John Wiley Sons, 2016. Steward, P. A. "The Religious Faith in the Victorian Age."Ashvamegh... the literary flight!2.19 (2016).